<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title><![CDATA[Beyond EVE: Events]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
        <language>de-DE</language>
        <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:03:44 +0100</pubDate>

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Preparing for a Fascist America]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/preparing-for-a-fascist-america</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The ongoing coup against American democracy raises serious concerns for democracy worldwide. In this talk, Stanley argues that the history of the United States, as well as its present situation, justifies these concerns. More specifically, Stanley argues that the anti-democratic form that is emerging in the United States is a kind of racial fascism. Europe should prepare for the possibility of a fascist United States.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/jason-stanley" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Jason Stanley</strong></a> is the Jacob Urowsky Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. The author of <em>Know How, Languages in Context, Knowledge and Practical Interests</em> and <em>How Propaganda Works</em> also writes for publications including <em>The New York Times</em>, <em>The Washington Post</em>, <em>The Boston Review</em>, <em>The Guardian</em> and <em>Project Syndicate</em>. He is currently working with David Beaver on the forthcoming book <em>Politics of Language: An Essay in Non-Ideal Theory,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;during his stay as IWM Visiting Fellow, on&nbsp;<em>Fascism as a Social Kind</em> together with Susanna Siegel.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/node/330" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Marci Shore</strong></a>, Associate Professor at the Department of History at Yale University and IWM Visiting Fellow, will introduce the speaker and moderate the discussion.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:12:26 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Last Forty Years and the Next Forty: Eastern Europe, Europe, the World]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-last-forty-years-and-the-next-forty-eastern-europe-europe-the-world</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, part of a series of events marking the IWM’s 40th anniversary in 2022, Timothy Snyder and Yuval Noah Harari discussed what lessons we should take from the past four decades and what will determine the course of the years to come.</p><p>Topics included techno-optimism and -pessimism, the role of ideas in politics, the continuing relevance of history to geopolitics, the failure and the success of predictions from the past, the intellectual legacies of the late twentieth century, and the war in Ukraine and its possible consequences for coming decades.</p><p><strong>Yuval Noah Harari</strong> is a Professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He is the author of bestsellers <em>Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind</em>, <em>Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow</em>, <em>21 Lessons for the 21st Century</em>, <em>Sapiens: A Graphic History</em>, and the forthcoming <em>Unstoppable Us</em> - and has sold over 40 Million books worldwide. Harari writes regularly for publications such as The Guardian, Financial Times, The New York Times, The Atlantic, and The Economist - addressing current world affairs like COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine from a macro-historical perspective.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/timothy-snyder" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Timothy Snyder</strong></a> is the Levin Professor of History and Global Affairs at Yale University and IWM Permanent Fellow. His fifteen books, which include <em>The Road to Unfreedom</em>, <em>On Tyranny</em>,&nbsp;<em>Bloodlands</em>, and <em>Black Earth</em>, have been translated into more than forty languages and have received a similar number of awards. He holds state orders and honorary doctorates and has appeared in documentaries, on network television, and in major films.</p><p>The conversation was moderated by IWM Permanent Fellow <a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/ivan-krastev" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Ivan Krastev</strong></a>.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 14:59:17 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Jan-Werner Müller: The critical infrastructure of democracy]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/jan-werner-muller-the-critical-infrastructure-of-democracy</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the nineteenth century, political parties and professional media were widely deemed indispensable for the proper functioning of representative democracy. They constituted what one might call the critical infrastructure of democracy, an infrastructure that enabled citizens to use their basic rights effectively and also to reach each other (and be reached). Both intermediary institutions are undergoing major structural transformations today. It has proven difficult to judge these changes, partly because we lack a proper account of the distinctive roles of intermediary institutions beyond standard claims of “connecting citizens to the political system”. The lecture will offer such an account and also suggest normative criteria for judging how well intermediary powers are working.</p><p><strong>Jan-Werner Müller</strong> is Professor for Political Theory at Princeton University. He is co-founder of the European College of Liberal Arts (ECLA; today: Bard College Berlin). In addition to numerous published articles in the international press, Müller is the author of various monographs such as <em>“Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe” </em>(2013), <em>“Was ist Populism? Ein Essay”</em> (2016), or <em>“Furcht und Freiheit. Für einen anderen Liberalismus” </em>(2019). His essay <em>“Was ist Populismus?”</em> has been translated into numerous languages and is considered a central work for understanding contemporary political developments. Currently, Müller is developing a reassessment of intermediary institutions in democracy, which he will examine in the lecture.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 11:45:55 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[AlgorithmWatch forced to shut down Instagram monitoring project after threats from Facebook]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/algorithmwatch-forced-to-shut-down-instagram-monitoring-project-after-threats-from-facebook</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Digital platforms play an ever-increasing role in structuring and influencing public debate. Civil society watchdogs, researchers and journalists need to be able to hold them to account. But Facebook is increasingly fighting those who try. It shut down New York University’s Ad Observatory last week, and went after AlgorithmWatch, too. The European Parliament and EU Member States must act now to prevent further bullying.</strong></p><p>On 3 March 2020, AlgorithmWatch launched a project to monitor Instagram’s newsfeed algorithm. Volunteers could install a browser add-on that scraped their Instagram newsfeeds. Data was sent to a database we used to study how Instagram prioritizes pictures and videos in a user’s timeline.</p><p>Over the last 14 months, about 1,500 volunteers installed the add-on. With their data, we were able to show that Instagram likely <a href="https://algorithmwatch.org/en/story/instagram-algorithm-nudity/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">encouraged</a> content creators to post pictures that fit specific representations of their body, and that politicians were likely to <a href="https://algorithmwatch.org/en/instagram-algorithm-politicians/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reach a larger audience</a> if they abstained from using text in their publications (Facebook denied both claims). Although we could not conduct a precise audit of Instagram’s algorithm, this research is among the most advanced studies ever conducted on the platform. The project was supported by the European Data Journalism Network and by the Dutch foundation SIDN. It was done in partnership with <a href="https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/150620/sur-instagram-la-prime-secrete-la-nudite-se-deshabiller-pour-gagner-de-l-audience" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Mediapart</a> in France, <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210303082809/https:/nos.nl/artikel/2371016-het-algoritme-van-instagram-verslaan-best-lastig-voor-een-politicus.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">NOS</a>, <a href="https://www.groene.nl/artikel/de-poppetjes-zijn-op-instagram-belangrijker-dan-de-inhoud" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Groene Amsterdammer</a> and <a href="https://pointer.kro-ncrv.nl/politieke-campagnes-met-veel-selfies-worden-beloond-door-het-instagram-algoritme" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pointer</a> in the Netherlands, <a href="https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wahlfilter" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Süddeutsche Zeitung</a> in Germany and was covered by dozens of news outlets over the world.</p><p><em>by Nicolas Kayser-Bril</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[AlgorithmWatch gGmbH <info@algorithmwatch.org>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:20:41 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Informing Ourselves to Death: Conspiracy and Fantasy in Postmodern Russia]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/informing-ourselves-to-death-conspiracy-and-fantasy-in-postmodern-russia</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the USSR, information was a scarce resource shared only sparingly with the population at large; now Russians are awash in a flood of information. Yet each scenario proved conducive to unfettered suspicion and widespread conspiracy theorizing. Now the Russian media encourage viewers to believe they are surrounded by enemies who want to brainwash them with propaganda. Post-Soviet conspiracy theories peddle heroic fantasies of a victimized nation and contradictory messages about the nature of human subjectivity.</p><p><strong>Eliot Borenstein</strong> ist Professor für Russistik und Slawistik an der New York University. Unter seinen vielfach ausgezeichneten Publikationen zur politischen Medienkultur Russlands finden sich zuletzt »Overkill: Sex and Violence in Contemporary Russian Popular Culture« [2007], »Plots against Russia: Conspiracy and Fantasy after Socialism« [2019] und »Pussy Riot: Speaking Punk to Power« [2020]. Demnächst erscheint seine Monographie zu viralen Netzphänomenen in Russland mit dem Titel »Meanwhile in Russia…: Russian Internet Memes and Viral Video«. Borenstein ist zudem Herausgeber des Blogs »All the Russians« für das NYU Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia«.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:35:09 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Built Order: Spaces of Power / The Architecture of European Integration]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/built-order-spaces-of-power-the-architecture-of-european-integration</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The architecture of the space around us has a considerable influence on our everyday lives. However, the resulting layout is rarely accidental and unintentional. Architects who design government and administrative buildings, urban spaces, libraries or other built structures have always been guided by the aesthetic as well as functional requirements and needs that are placed on the buildings and architectures they design. The result is architecturally manifested space that intends to reflect and constitute political-social orders and ideals or designed with regard to specific forms of exercising and securing power.</p><p>The lecture series “Gebaute Ordnung” (Built Order) will investigate spaces of power during the 2021 summer semester. In particular, the speakers will explore how aspects of the architectural and spatial perceptibly interlock with political and social orders. Four evening lectures will touch on the topics of architectures of integration, exclusion and annihilation, representation and legitimation, and the securing of power.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>SEBASTIANO FABBRINI</p><p> The Architecture of European Integration</p><p>“Architekturen des Ordnens” is a four-year (2020-2023) interdisciplinary research project of the Goethe University Frankfurt and Technical University Darmstadt, with the Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Theory and the Deutsches Architekturmuseum as non-university partners.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[German Architecture Museum <info.dam@stadt-frankfurt.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2021 12:21:15 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Normative Orders]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/goethe-universitat-frankfurt-am-main-normativeorders</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Freedom and justice, tolerance and participation: the researchers in the&nbsp;Research Centre "Normative Orders" of Goethe University are reflecting on such rights and principles in social life. How are political, legal, religious or economic orders established, and how do they change? How do structures of power crystallize in such processes of social dynamics? How are power and life chances distributed, on national and transnational levels? The topic is of high social relevance: we need to reflect on a world the orders of which are defended with power and yet are still fragile. The research of the Centre focuses on current social conflicts about a fair order of society in times of globalization, as well as its long prehistory. It examines the normative ideas that play a role in such processes and conflicts, as well as how they can be criticized or justified. Above all, the fundamentals of politics and law are highlighted in the humanities and social sciences.</p><p>Such questions are complex, and it for this reason that the&nbsp;Research Centre "Normative Orders" of Goethe University in Frankfurt works on an interdisciplinary basis: from philosophy, history, political science and law to ethnology, economics, sociology and theology.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:40:40 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The trend towards de-globalization]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-trend-towards-de-globalization</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Putting the brakes on international development?</em></p><p><br></p><p>Growing public discontent with globalization has led to increased nationalist and protectionist policies in economies around the globe. These policies affect how companies operate internationally, especially with regard to their global value chains, resulting in important implications for international development. In this panel, experts discuss the potential effects of a slower globalization or de-globalization on the economic development of emerging and developing countries.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This event is organized by the Department of Global Business and Trade and will be held online only</em></p><p><br></p><p>Lecture / discussion:</p><p><strong>Hafiz Mirza</strong>, Lead, Responsible Agricultural Investment Research, Agriculture &amp; Investment Economic Law &amp; Policy Programme, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Canada/Switzerland</p><p><strong>Rajneesh Narula</strong>, The John H. Dunning Chair in International Business Henley Business School, United Kingdom</p><p><strong>Annie Wei</strong>, Chair in International Business, University of Leeds, United Kingdom</p><p><strong>Abel Kinoti,</strong> Dean, School of Business, Founding Chair, Academy of International Business – Africa, Innovation and Social Business Incubation Consultant in Africa, China Research-Based Study Program, Riara University, Nairobi, Kenya</p><p><br></p><p>Moderation:</p><p><strong>Alex Mohr</strong>, Professor of International Business, Department of Global Business and Trade, WU</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:22:21 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A Call for EU Cyber Diplomacy.]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/a-call-for-eu-cyber-diplomacy</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In December 2020, the European Union (EU) presented its new strategy on cybersecurity with the aim of strengthening Europe’s technological and digital sovereignty. The document lists reform projects that will link cybersecurity more closely with the EU’s new rules on data, algorithms, markets, and Internet services. However, it clearly falls short of the development of a European cyber diplomacy that is committed to both “strategic openness” and the protection of the digital single market. In order to achieve this, EU cyber diplomacy should be made more coherent in its supranational, demo­cratic, and economic/technological dimensions. Germany can make an important con­tribution to that by providing the necessary legal, technical, and financial resources for the European External Action Service (EEAS).</p><p>In the latest issue of <a href="https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/swp-comments-en/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>SWP Comment</strong></a>, <a href="https://leibniz-hbi.de/en/staff/matthias-c-kettemann" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>PD Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann</strong></a> and Annegret Bendiek explain why the new EU cybersecurity strategy is too one-sided. The focus should not only be on deterrence and defense, but also on trust and security. They advocate for promoting cyber diplomacy in the European Union.</p><p><strong>Bendiek, A.; Kettemann, M. C. (2021): Revisiting the EU Cybersecurity Strategy: A Call for EU Cyber Diplomacy. In: SWP Comment</strong></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Leibniz Institute for Media Research │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) <info@hans-bredow-institut.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:24:40 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Disasters and Social Reproduction - Crisis Response between the State and Community]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/disasters-and-social-reproduction-crisis-response-between-the-state-and-community</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Booklaunch within the Postdoctoral Dialogue Series "Norms, Plurality and Critique"</strong></p><p>With<strong> Dr. Peer Illner</strong> (Normative Orders, Goethe University) and <strong>Prof. Darrel Moellendorf</strong> (Normative Orders, Goethe University)</p><p>Welcome Address by: <strong>Prof. Rainer Forst</strong> (Normative Orders, Goethe University)</p><p>Organized by:&nbsp;<strong>Dr. Peer Illner</strong> (Author)</p><p>Many communities in the United States have been abandoned by the state. What happens when natural disasters add to their misery? This book looks at the broken relationship between the federal government and civil society in times of crises.</p><p>Mutual aid has gained renewed importance in providing relief when hurricanes, floods and pandemics hit, as cuts to state spending put significant strain on communities struggling to survive. Harking back to the self-organised welfare programmes of the Black Panther Party, radical social movements from Occupy to Black Lives Matter are building autonomous aid networks within and against the state. However, as the federal responsibility for relief is lifted, mutual aid faces a profound dilemma: do ordinary people become complicit in their own exploitation? </p><p>Reframing disaster relief through the lens of social reproduction, Peer Illner tracks the shifts in American emergency aid, from the economic crises of the 1970s to the COVID-19 pandemic, raising difficult questions about mutual aid’s double-edged role in cuts to social spending. As sea levels rise, climate change worsens and new pandemics sweep the globe, Illner’s analysis of the interrelations between the state, the market and grassroots initiatives will prove indispensable.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:00:44 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Just One More Thing]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/just-one-more-thing</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A. L. Kennedy is a Scottish author of numerous novels, essays, and newspaper columns, with occasional appearances as a stand-up comedian; most of her novels have been translated into German, most recently: "Das Blaue Buch" [2014]", "Gleißendes Glück" [2016], "Leises Schlängeln" [2016], "Süßer Ernst" [2018], in 2020 her short story collection "We are Attempting to Survive Our Time" was published; her columns appear in the "Guardian" and most recently, on the 'Brexit disaster' also in the "Süddeutsche Zeitung"; in Germany she received, among others. In Germany, she has received the Heinrich Heine Prize from the city of Düsseldorf.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:03:44 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Iyad Rahwan: How to trust machines?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/iyad-rahwan-how-to-trust-machines</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Machine intelligence plays a growing role in our lives. Today, machines recommend things to us, such as news, music, and household products. They trade in our stock markets and optimise our transportation and logistics. They are also beginning to drive us around, play with our children, diagnose our health. How do we ensure that these machines will be trustworthy? This lecture explores various psychological, social, cultural, and political factors that shape our trust in machines and pleads for the accomplishment of the challenges of the information revolution not only to be understood as a problem of computer science.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Iyad Rahwan</strong> is director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, where he founded and leads the Center for Humans and Machines. He is also an honorary professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Technische Universität Berlin. Until June 2020, he was an Associate Professor of Media Arts &amp; Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Rahwan holds a PhD in Information Systems (Artificial Intelligence) from the University of Melbourne, Australia. His work lies at the intersection of computer science and human behavior, with a focus on collective intelligence, large-scale cooperation, and the societal impact of artificial intelligence and social media. In addition to various journal articles, Iyad Rahwan is co-author of the study <em>Reply to: Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles</em> and together with Jean-François Bonnefon he published the paper <em>Machine Thinking, Fast and Slow</em> (both 2020).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>The event will be held in English. </strong></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/harvard-university-berkman-klein-center-for-internet-society</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Berkman Klein Center's mission is to explore and understand cyberspace; to study its development, dynamics, norms, and standards; and to assess the need or lack thereof for laws and sanctions. We are a research center, premised on the observation that what we seek to learn is not already recorded. Our method is to build out into cyberspace, record data as we go, self-study, and share. Our mode is entrepreneurial nonprofit. </p><p><br></p><p><strong>The Center in Brief</strong></p><p>We bring together the sharpest, most thoughtful people from around the globe to tackle the biggest challenges presented by the Internet. As an interdisciplinary, University-wide center with a global scope, we have an unparalleled track record of leveraging exceptional academic rigor to produce real- world impact. We pride ourselves on pushing the edges of scholarly research, building tools and platforms that break new ground, and fostering active networks across diverse communities. United by our commitment to the public interest, our vibrant, collaborative community of independent thinkers represents a wide range of philosophies and disciplines, making us a unique home for open-minded inquiry, debate, and experimentation.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:02:59 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Akademie für politische Bildung Tutzing]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/akademie-fur-politische-bildung-tutzing</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>What does the academy represent</strong> The Akademie für Politische Bildung (Scholarship - Education - Public Services) is - An independent, publicly funded forum for the training of teachers, professionals and academics. It is also a research institution in the fields of political and social sciences, history, economics and media studies - A venue for communication and information on current and general topics of both national as well as international political interest - A space to critically discuss contemporary history - A place for the advanced political education of professionals, teachers and academics working at a host of different public and private institutions - A meeting point where politicians and scholars research and discuss civic education and gather with citizens to exchange views to create more citizen-friendly policies - A place for scientific research and issuing politically relevant publications </p><p><br></p><p><strong>The basis of our work</strong> We have dedicated ourselves to the delivery, stimulation and cultivation of political knowledge in Bavaria and Germany above all party lines. Thus we are working towards a stronger foundation of our democracy and its international relations. Not only do we keep a focus on state and federal policies, but to various sites of political processes worldwide and pick up on the latest topics in politics, economy and society and make them a subject of discussion. The academy was founded by the Bavarian Parliament in 1957 as an autonomous and independent public-law institution. The academy is financed by the Free State of Bavaria, but retains full independence in the statutory framework set forth by the Bavarian Ministry of Culture and Education. It cannot be compared to any other institution for political education in Germany. We conduct – partially in cooperation with other partners – courses, seminars, workshops and scholarly conferences on our own premises in Tutzing on Lake Starnberg. Besides that, we arrange conferences and roundtable discussions with politicians and other figures of public prominence throughout Bavaria. Most of the seminars we offer are organized by our own renowned experts who invite subject familiar professionals from all over the world. In exceptional cases, we host seminars with other institutions.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Akademie für politische Bildung Tutzing <info@apb-tutzing.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:32:59 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/post-growth-2018-conference</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The Post-Growth 2018 Conference is a multi-stakeholder gathering organized by ten Members of the European Parliament representing five political groups: Philippe Lamberts, Florent Marcellesi and Molly Scott-Cato (Greens/EFA), Alojz Peterle (EPP), Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (ALDE), Marisa Matias and Helmut Scholz (GUE) and Guillaume Balas, Elly Schlein and Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D). Our key aim is to re-think future policies and discuss alternatives respecting the environment, human rights and viable economic development.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></author>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:19:11 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[digitalcourage]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/digitalcourage</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<strong>Digitalcourage works for a liveable world in the digital age.</strong>

Since 1987, Digitalcourage advocates for fundamental rights, privacy and protecting personal data. We are a group of people from a variety of backgrounds who explore technology and politics with a critical mindset, and who want to shape both with a focus on human dignity.

We do not want our democracy to be “datafied” and sold out. We work against a society that turns people into targets for marketing, regards them as dispensable in times of a shrinking state, and places them under suspicion as potential terrorists. We stand for a living democracy.

Digitalcourage informs through publicity, speeches, events and congenial interventions. Every year we bestow the German Big Brother Awards (“Oscars for data leeches”). We contribute our expertise to the political process – sometimes without being invited.

More details in English on our background and history can be found on Wikipedia.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[digitalcourage <mail@digitalcourage.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:33:33 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anger and its Interaction with Love and Hate]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/anger-and-its-interaction-with-love-and-hate</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has anger become such a dominant theme in today's world that people have even spoken of an "age of anger"? Is it conceivable that this emotionalization could also have a positive effect, under what conditions? In terms of the history of philosophy and religion, two approaches to this topic can be identified. On the one hand, a complete rejection, in Buddhism, for example, and in Stoicism; on the other hand, the approving qualification of anger as a virtue, under special circumstances, for example, in Aristoteles and Thomas von Aquin. Absolute negation has a detrimental effect when certain sensations are so excluded, including positively experienced sensations. Essentially, two causes can be identified for the increasing affliction by anger in our society. On the one hand, the evaporation of traditional as well as new values; on the other hand, the all too arbitrary expression of anger in the social media. In addition, it has the effect that more and more anger-filled protest actions, of youth, of women, show a challenge to traditional specifications. Meanwhile, anger as a popular and triumphant affect misses the mark. A binding, moral force can only emerge when anger gains coherence, in its sustainability, intensity, and reach. Otherwise, anger becomes destructive rage.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Aaron Ben-Ze'ev</strong> is a professor of philosophy at the University of Haifa (Israel), of which he was president for many years; research in social philosophy, perception theory, and everyday psychology; numerous publications on the historical and contemporary politics of emotions, including "Love Online: Emotions on the Internet" (2004), "The Logic of Emotions. A Critique of Emotional Intelligence" (2009), "The Arc of Love. How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time" (2019).</p><p><em>Introduction and talk: Ethel Matala de Mazza</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:57:36 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anger and its Interaction with Love and Hate]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/anger-and-its-interaction-with-love-and-hate-2</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has anger become such a dominant theme in today's world that people have even spoken of an "age of anger"? Is it conceivable that this emotionalization could also have a positive effect, under what conditions? In terms of the history of philosophy and religion, two approaches to this topic can be identified. On the one hand, a complete rejection, in Buddhism, for example, and in Stoicism; on the other hand, the approving qualification of anger as a virtue, under special circumstances, for example, in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Absolute negation has a detrimental effect when certain sensations are so excluded, including positively experienced sensations. Essentially, two causes can be identified for the increasing affliction by anger in our society. On the one hand, the evaporation of traditional as well as new values; on the other hand, the all too arbitrary expression of anger in the social media. In addition, it has the effect that more and more anger-filled protest actions, of youth, of women, show a challenge to traditional specifications. Meanwhile, anger as a popular and triumphant affect misses the mark. A binding, moral force can only emerge when anger gains coherence, in its sustainability, intensity, and reach. Otherwise, anger becomes destructive rage.</p><p><br></p><p>Aaron Ben-Ze'ev is professor of philosophy at the University of Haifa (Israel), of which he was president for many years; research in social philosophy, perception theory, and everyday psychology; numerous publications on the historical and contemporary politics of emotions, including "Love Online: Emotions on the Internet" (2004), "The Logic of Emotions. A Critique of Emotional Intelligence" (2009), "The Arc of Love. How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time" (2019).</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:44:18 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-normative-order-of-the-internet-a-theory-of-rule-and-regulation-online</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>There is order on the internet, but how has this order emerged and what challenges will threaten and shape its future? This study shows how a legitimate order of norms has emerged online, through both national and international legal systems. It establishes the emergence of a normative order of the internet, an order which explains and justifies processes of online rule and regulation. This order integrates norms at three different levels (regional, national, international), of two types (privately and publicly authored), and of different character (from ius cogens to technical standards). Matthias C. Kettemann assesses their internal coherence, their consonance with other order norms and their consistency with the order's finality. The normative order of the internet is based on and produces a liquefied system characterized by self-learning normativity. In light of the importance of the socio-communicative online space, this is a book for anyone interested in understanding the contemporary development of the internet. <strong>Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann</strong>, LL.M. (Harvard), Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Insitut Hamburg, Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität Um Anmeldung wird gebeten. Die Veranstaltung wird virtuell über GoToMeeting stattfinden. </p><p><br></p><p>Die Einwahldaten werden nach der Anmeldung übermittelt. Oxford University Press 2020 Veranstalter: Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut, Sustainable Computing Lab, WU Wien, Humboldt-Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft (HIIG) und Oxford University Press</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:43:34 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Creating New Futures for Local Newspapers]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/creating-new-futures-for-local-newspapers</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Local newspapers are in peril. Although they continue to serve millions of Americans with vital information about their communities, newspapers face an extremely difficult environment. Private capital has stepped in to manage the business risk and take advantage of the remaining asset strength of newspapers. But the ownership, governance, and values of private capital do not foster the business or social transformation that local newspapers need to serve their communities. What can we do to help local papers find a new footing?</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Elizabeth Hansen</strong> and <strong>Marc Hand</strong> have released a <a href="https://shorensteincenter.org/the-national-trust-for-local-news/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">paper</a> proposing a new National Trust for Local News that would support the financing and transition of local newspapers to new ownership and governance structures. They will present the outline of their proposal in this webinar, and engage in conversation with fellow panelists about the future of local newspapers. <strong>Steve Waldman</strong>, CEO and cofounder of Report for America will discuss his similar “replanting” proposal, recently published by the Open Markets Institute. <strong>Geoff Davis</strong>, CEO of the Sorenson Impact Center at the University of Utah, will comment on how social impact capital might be mobilized to respond to the business crisis in local journalism, and how these proposals relate to other new institutions being built to solve major social challenges. <strong>Setti Warren</strong>, Executive Director of the Shorenstein Center and former Mayor of Newton, MA, will moderate and comment on the importance of local journalism to public life in cities and towns.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:41:59 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A New World (Dis-)Order]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/a-new-world-dis-order</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Czech Embassy in Vienna, in cooperation with the Institute for Human Sciences (IWM) generously supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic, invited for an evening discussion at the Czech Embassy in Vienna. The debate addressed the growing geopolitical insecurity and the new challenges posed by the global pandemic.</p><p>In debate:</p><p><strong>Lubomír Zaorálek</strong>, Minister of Culture of the Czech Republic and former Foreign Minister,</p><p>and</p><p><strong>Timothy Snyder</strong>, Richard C. Levin Professor of History at Yale University and Permanent Fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences.</p><p>The discussion was moderated by&nbsp;<strong>Dagmar Rychnovská</strong>, a political scientist, lecturer at the University of Sussex.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:27:02 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Terms of Disservice Book Launch]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/terms-of-disservice-book-launch</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Shorenstein Center hosted an&nbsp;<strong>online book launch for&nbsp;<em>Terms of Disservice</em></strong>, authored by senior fellow and co-director of the Digital Platforms &amp; Democracy Project,&nbsp;<strong>Dipayan Ghosh</strong>. The event featured Shorenstein Center director&nbsp;<strong>Nancy Gibbs</strong>, former Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign manager and HKS Defending Digital Democracy program director&nbsp;<strong>Robby Mook</strong>, and&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>&nbsp;chief technology correspondent&nbsp;<strong>Mark Scott,</strong> discussing the structure of the modern digital economy and its interface with social issues in America today.Ghosh contends that the business model underlying the consumer internet sector implicates our welfare from economic, political, and social perspectives.&nbsp;<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__shorensteincenter.us1.list-2Dmanage.com_track_click-3Fu-3D30699762a3826bbf132818652-26id-3D46f7bd679d-26e-3Dc6de6c7fd0&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&amp;r=OItGXn4rLkJFn1pUn1Fh9XSbO_qbiTqsyGb_mvLAvgw&amp;m=Y0r3FXEw9NBtKArdevUPMehms2Tp916tncpQgBpRE5g&amp;s=DjfWyKxDKdcsuEtT4F0zzVoSgASZ2zchepUxA7lXRmc&amp;e=" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong><em>T</em></strong></a><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__shorensteincenter.us1.list-2Dmanage.com_track_click-3Fu-3D30699762a3826bbf132818652-26id-3D854b30df9e-26e-3Dc6de6c7fd0&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&amp;r=OItGXn4rLkJFn1pUn1Fh9XSbO_qbiTqsyGb_mvLAvgw&amp;m=Y0r3FXEw9NBtKArdevUPMehms2Tp916tncpQgBpRE5g&amp;s=QLjssoerZvtwM3XcY1nV2v_V94K3tfG_KEhnEI_ppHw&amp;e=" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong><em>erms of Disservice&nbsp;</em></strong></a><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__shorensteincenter.us1.list-2Dmanage.com_track_click-3Fu-3D30699762a3826bbf132818652-26id-3D988c032f3f-26e-3Dc6de6c7fd0&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&amp;r=OItGXn4rLkJFn1pUn1Fh9XSbO_qbiTqsyGb_mvLAvgw&amp;m=Y0r3FXEw9NBtKArdevUPMehms2Tp916tncpQgBpRE5g&amp;s=V8E7DIHybCqLXLFBSWaPNbqdL94gIj6xBvZR1w_XEd4&amp;e=" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>(Brookings Institution Press)</strong></a>&nbsp;attempts to chart out a path forward for a new digital social contract to establish better economic equity.</p><p><br></p><p>Key findings in&nbsp;<em>Terms of Disservice</em>&nbsp;include:</p><ul><li><strong>“The exploitative rake of data and attention on the path to natural monopoly”</strong>: The dominant internet firms deal in a novel currency with consumers based on data and attention — and through it have become natural monopolies.</li><li><strong>“The radical commercialization of decision making”</strong>: Personal data is collected at a mind-blowing rate and level of granularity. Internet firms engage in radical, “commercialized bias” — and have marketized the segmentation and splicing of society.</li><li><strong>“The dilemma of attending to content policy reform”</strong>: Our immediate attention to matters of content policy reform is misplaced; the more important target in the realm of Big Tech reform is fundamental economic regulation of the industry.</li></ul><p><br></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:23:09 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Joanna Bryson: The role of humans in an age of intelligent machines]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/joanna-bryson-the-role-of-humans-in-an-age-of-intelligent-machines</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and the information age are bringing us more information about ourselves and each other than any society has ever known. Yet at the same time it brings machines seemingly more capable of every human endeavour than any human can be. What are the limits of AI? Of intelligence and humanity more broadly? What are our ethical obligations to machines? Do these alter our obligations to each other? What is the basis of our social obligations?</p><p>In her lecture Joanna Bryson will argue that there are really only two problems humanity has to solve: sustainability and inequality, or put another way: security and power. Or put a third way: how big of a pie can we make, and how do we slice up that pie? Life is not a zero-sum game. We use the security of sociality to construct public goods where everyone benefits. But still, every individual needs enough pie to thrive, and this is the challenge of inequality. Joanna Bryson will argue that understanding these processes answers the questions above. She will then look at how AI is presently affecting both these problems. </p><p><br></p><p><strong>Joanna J Bryson</strong>, Professor of Ethics and Technology at Hertie School, is an academic recognised for broad expertise on intelligence, its nature, and its consequences. She advises governments, transnational agencies, and NGOs globally, particularly in AI policy. She holds two degrees each in psychology and AI (BA Chicago, MSc &amp; MPhil Edinburgh, PhD MIT). Her work has appeared in venues ranging from reddit to the journal Science. She continues to research both the systems engineering of AI and the cognitive science of intelligence, with present focuses on the impact of technology on human cooperation, and new models of governance for AI and ICT. </p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:15:09 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Key points of a legislative initiative for reliable and adequate renewable energy supply]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/key-points-of-a-legislative-initiative-for-reliable-and-adequate-renewable-energy-supply</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Stimulating investments in sector coupling and innovation: Energy Watch Group&nbsp;proposes new law for reliable and adequate renewable energy systems</em></p><p>On the occasion of this year’s 20th anniversary of the German Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), the Berlin-based Think-and-Do Tank Energy Watch Group (EWG) presents a legislative proposal to stimulate the system integration of renewable energy. The underlying purpose of the policy proposal is to allow renewable energy sources to finally assume responsibility for the system security of the power supply – i.e. to cover the required energy demand at every hour of the year. With a so-called combined power plant tariff, the instrument intends to stimulate investments for full demand coverage by 100% renewable energy. Based on own techno-economic cost estimates and a legal examination of EU regulations, the EWG proposes a fixed-feed-in-tariff of 8 cents/kWh, supported by a sliding market premium.</p><p>While renewables keep setting records in terms of their shares of national electricity mixes – Germany has recently hit the 50% mark –, a full transformation to an entirely renewable-based energy system is not yet widely regarded to be a tangible reality. One of the main reasons is the prevailing mistrust of the ability of renewables to provide year-round supply. Many scientific studies have already shown that a complete conversion to renewables is not only critical for reasons of climate protection, but also that it is technologically feasible (in combination with storage technologies and digital control technology) at any hour of the year and at cost-effective prices. What is still missing, however, is a legal basis to enable the market penetration of reliable and adequate 100% renewable energy systems.</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Energy Watch Group (EWG) <office@energywatchgroup.org>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 14:43:42 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Commercial Content Moderation during the Pandemic]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/commercial-content-moderation-during-the-pandemic</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>As we clumsily shift our lives online, the cracks in the information infrastructure are bursting open. While there’s been an uptick in boosting trusted content by credible sources, like the Center for Disease Control and the World Health Organization, there has simultaneously been sweeping purges of advertisements seeking to capitalize on the crisis and suspicious accounts, leaving us to wonder who’s heard and who’s harmed in the current infodemic. Amidst this sliding scale of uncertainty, we turn to leading voices in the field,&nbsp;UCLA professors<strong>&nbsp;Safiya Umoja Noble, PhD&nbsp;</strong>and<strong>&nbsp;Sarah T. Roberts</strong>,&nbsp;<strong>PhD&nbsp;</strong>and&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp;Reporter,<strong>&nbsp;Elizabeth Dwoskin,</strong>&nbsp;who have been taking stock of how commercial content is being moderated during the pandemic.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Safiya Umoja Noble</strong> is an Associate Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, in the Department of Information Studies and serves as the Co-Director of the UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry. She is the author of a best-selling book on racist and sexist algorithmic bias in search engines titled:&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479837243/algorithms-of-oppression/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism</em></a>.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Sarah T. Roberts</strong> serves as an Assistant Professor of Information Studies at UCLA’s School of Education and Information Studies. Roberts is a leading authority on “commercial content moderation”, the term she coined to describe the work of those responsible for making sure the photos, videos and stories posted to commercial websites fit within legal, ethical and the site’s own guidelines and standards.&nbsp;Her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300235883/behind-screen" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media</a>, was released on Yale University Press in 2019.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Elizabeth Dwoskin</strong>, a Silicon Valley correspondent at&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post,</em>&nbsp;covers the rise of data mining, machine learning and AI throughout the tech industry and in the economy at large. Dwoskin’s recent articles – from&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/10/apple-google-tracking-coronavirus/?itid=ap_elizabethdwoskin" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">smartphone apps</a>&nbsp;that map infection pathways to new trends in consumer habits that give way to greater&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/27/big-tech-coronavirus-winners/?itid=ap_elizabethdwoskin" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">market monopolization&nbsp;</a>– offer readers around the world fresh insight on what’s at play amid the coronavirus pandemic.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:52:21 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Don’t panic. It’s just the collapse of neoliberalism.]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/dont-panic-its-just-the-collapse-of-neoliberalism</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Part of the speaker series on misinformation, co-sponsored by the&nbsp;</em></strong><a href="https://web.northeastern.edu/nulab/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong><em>NULab</em></strong></a><strong><em>&nbsp;at Northeastern University.</em></strong></p><p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p><p><strong>Yochai Benkler</strong> is the Berkman Professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School, and faculty co-director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University. Since the 1990s he has played a role in characterizing the role of information commons and decentralized collaboration to innovation, information production, and freedom in the networked economy and society. His books include&nbsp;<strong><em>The Wealth of Networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom</em></strong>&nbsp;(Yale University Press 2006), which won academic awards from the American Political Science Association, the American Sociological Association, and the McGannon award for social and ethical relevance in communications. In 2012 he received a lifetime achievement award from Oxford University in recognition of his contribution to the study and public understanding of the Internet and information goods. His work is socially engaged, winning him the Ford Foundation Visionaries Award in 2011, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Pioneer Award for 2007, and the Public Knowledge IP3 Award in 2006. It is also anchored in the realities of markets, cited as “perhaps the best work yet about the fast moving, enthusiast-driven Internet” by the Financial Times and named best business book about the future in 2006 by Strategy and Business. Benkler has advised governments and international organizations on innovation policy and telecommunications, and serves on the boards or advisory boards of several nonprofits engaged in working towards an open society. </p><p><br></p><p><em>His work can be freely accessed at </em><a href="http://www.benkler.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>http://www.benkler.org</em></a><em>.</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:46:20 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA["Think Europe – Europe thinks“ mit Bundesaußenminister a. D. Sigmar Gabriel]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/think-europe-europe-thinks-mit-bundesaussenminister-a-d-sigmar-gabriel</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Das Center for Applied European Studies (CAES) lädt Sie im Rahmen der Veranstaltungsreihe "Think Europe – Europe thinks" herzlich ein zu einem Vortrag von Bundesaußenminister a. D. Sigmar Gabriel mit dem Titel:

<strong>"Europas Antwort auf Donald Trump – über das europäisch-amerikanische (Un-)Verständnis"</strong>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences - Center for Applied European Studies <info@caes.fra-uas.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:47:13 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Who Governs the Internet?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/who-governs-the-internet</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Based on the guiding principle „digital policy means social policy“, this publication follows the idea that internet governance affects everyone. An open, free and global Internet is vital for all. Therefore, infrastructures for surveillance and censorship should not be established.</p><p>This publication gives an overview of actors and areas of action and stresses that collective engagement is needed more than ever to further develop Internet governance, to strengthen multistakerholderism as well as multilateralism and to hinder the fragmentation of the net. The publication was created by iRights.Lab on behalf the FES.</p><p><a href="http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/akademie/15917.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Here</a> you find the online version of "Who Governs the Internet?"</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Friedrich Ebert Stiftung]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:43:49 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Crypto-Politics. Encryption and Democratic Practices in the Digital Era]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/crypto-politics-encryption-and-democratic-practices-in-the-digital-era</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The volume centres on the debates on digital encryption in Germany and the USA, during the aftermath of Edward Snowden’s leaks, which revolved around the value of privacy and the legitimacy of surveillance practices. Using a discourse analysis of mass media and specialist debates, it shows how these are closely interlinked with technological controversies and how, as a result, contestation emerges not within one public sphere but within multiple expert circles. The book develops the notion of ‘publicness’ in order to grasp the political significance of these controversies, thereby making an innovative contribution to Critical Security Studies by introducing digital encryption as an important site for understanding the broader debates on cyber security and surveillance.</p><p><br></p><p>Mit:<strong> Dr. Linda Monsees</strong> (Autorin, Postdoktorandin am Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen"), <strong>Prof. Peter Burgess</strong> (Professor and Chair of Geopolitics of Risk at the Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris) und <strong>Prof. Dr. Nicole Deitelhoff</strong> (Direktorin des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Principal Investigator des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen", Professorin für Internationale Beziehungen und Theorien globaler Ordnungen der Goethe-Universität)</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Rethinking Responsibility]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/rethinking-responsibility</link>
                <description><![CDATA[After the publication of Hans Jonas' <strong>Das Prinzip Verantwortung</strong> forty years ago, the principle of responsibility has become a key concept in moral and political debates. Yet the unconditional responsibility for the possibility of the existence of future generations – not only of humans, but also of other living beings – is invariably accompanied by the "heuristics of fear," which presupposes imagining the worst-case scenario and a pronouncedly bleak future. The dystopian principle of responsibility was introduced as a response to Bloch's Das Prinzip Hoffnung, which envisions the possibility of a utopian future for humanity. The proposed project will discuss these two principles and will argue that they are not mutually exclusive, so that, while still preserving the imperative of responsibility, one can maintain a utopian ideal as a regulative idea for moral and political action.

<strong>Dmitri Nikulin</strong> ist Professor für Philosophie an der New School for Social Research in New York. Von August ‒ Oktober 2019 ist er auf Einladung von Professor Rainer Forst und dem Exzellenzcluster »Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen« Fellow am Forschungskolleg Humanwissenschaften der Goethe-Universität.

Um Anmeldung bis zum 14. Oktober 2019 wird gebeten]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:00:02 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Politics of Difference: Race, Technology, and Inclusion]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-politics-of-difference-race-technology-and-inclusion</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://shorensteincenter.org/about-us/areas-of-focus/technology-social-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Technology and Social Change Research Project</a> and the <a href="https://shorensteincenter.org/about-us/areas-of-focus/news-equity-race-gender/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Initiative for Institutional Anti-Racism and Accountability</a> – both core research projects at the Shorenstein Center – recently co-sponsored an event at the IOP JFK Jr. Forum on “The Politics of Difference: Race, Technology, and Inclusion.”</p><p><br></p><p>Panelists included: </p><ul><li><strong>Prof. Khalil Gibran Muhammad</strong>, faculty director of the Initiative for Institutional Anti-Racism and Accountability and Professor of History, Race, and Public Policy at the Kennedy School</li><li><strong>Prof. Ruha Benjamin, </strong>Associate Professor of African American Studies at Princeton University</li><li><strong>Latoya Peterson</strong>, journalist, digital media consultant, co-founder of Racialicious, and current Director of Culture at Glow Up Games</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Moderator: <strong>Dr. Joan Donovan, </strong>Research Director of the Technology and Social Change Research Project</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:28:09 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Rethinking Democratic Athens and Republican Rome in an Age of Plutocracy and Populism]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/rethinking-democratic-athens-and-republican-rome-in-an-age-of-plutocracy-and-populism</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Two ancient polities, Athenian democracy and the Roman republic, figure prominently in debates over the contemporary crisis of “liberal,” “electoral” or “representative” democracy. Democratic Athens and republican Rome are often invoked as models to be imitated or avoided in efforts to address rising political inequality and rampant political corruption in our plutocratic age. I criticize recent books by Philip Pettit, Nadia Urbinati and Josiah Ober that evaluate majoritarian and populist solutions, inspired by Athenian or Roman politics, to address the contemporary crisis of democracy. In response, I advocate classspecific or randomly distributed political offices, citizen referenda, and popularly judged political trials as ancient-inspired reforms intended to address the problems of unaccountable and unresponsive elites, socio-economic inequality and political corruption that plague contemporary democracies.</p><p><br></p><p><em>CV</em></p><p><strong>John P. McCormick</strong> is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago. He is the author of <em>Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology</em> (Cambridge University Press, 1997); <em>Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State: On Constitutional, Social and Supranational Democracy</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2007); <em>Machiavellian Democracy</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2011); and <em>Reading Machiavelli</em> (Princeton 2018). Professor McCormick has received the following fellowships: Fulbright Scholarship, the Center for European Law &amp; Politics, the University of Bremen in Germany (1994 – 95); Jean Monnet Fellowship, the European University Institute in Florence, Italy (1995 – 96); Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study Fellowship, Harvard University (2008 – 09); Rockefeller Foundation Resident Fellowship, Bellagio, Italy (2013); and National Endowment for the Humanities Grant (2017 – 18).</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:35:33 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Rethinking Growth: The Schumpeterian Perspective]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/rethinking-growth-the-schumpeterian-perspective</link>
                <description><![CDATA[WZB Distinguished Lecture in Social Sciences by <strong>Philippe Aghion</strong>

Introduction: <strong>Helmut Bester</strong>
Ever since the financial crisis, the threat of long-lasting (“secular”) economic stagnation has been haunting Western economies. Philippe Aghion looks at this enigma through the lens of the Schumpeterian growth paradigm. It claims that economic growth is generated by entrepreneurial innovations which replace old technologies. Aghion argues that productivity growth due to this creative destruction is mismeasured by statistical offices. He links the recent decline in productivity growth to the emergence of so-called super-star firms that have high profits and a low share of labor in firm value-added and sales.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH <wzb@wzb.eu>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:00:23 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Time is Right for Europe to Take the Lead in Global Internet Governance]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/the-time-is-right-for-europe-to-take-the-lead-in-global-internet-governance</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Europe is a key normative power. Its legitimacy as a force for ensuring the reign of rule of law in international relations is unparalleled. It also packs an economic punch. In data protection and the fight against cybercrime, European norms have been successfully globalized. The time is right to take the next step: Europe must now become the international normative leader for developing a new deal on internet governance. To ensure this, European powers should commit to rules that work in security, economic development and human rights on the internet and implement them in a reinvigorated IGF.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:29:11 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Conceptualizing the Future of Democracy: Combining Representation and Participatory Innovations]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/conceptualizing-the-future-of-democracy-combining-representation-and-participatory-innovations</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In the light of declining voter-turnout, party membership and trust in representative institutions, the democratic institutions developed in the 19th and 20th centuries, seem to be somewhat out of touch with the popular demands in current societies. This leads some authors to diagnose a crisis of democracy, or even the “death of democracy” (Keane 2009). At the same time, citizens strongly support the concept of democracy. Thus, rather than democracy itself being obsolete, we seem to witness a “process of transition from one type to another“ (Schmitter 2015). Yet, how should the future of democracy look like?
The debate on how to conceptualize hybrid systems of representative and participatory institutions is ongoing. Systemic approaches to designing mixed systems are scarce (Warren 2017), but en vogue. In the roundtable, we will follow this approach and discuss the future of democracy as innovative conceptions of purposeful combinations of representative and participatory institutions fulfilling democratic tasks and being in line with citizens preferences for participation.

Participants:
<strong>Rainer Forst</strong> (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen")
<strong>Jane Mansbridge</strong> (Harvard University, USA)
<strong>Anne Phillips</strong> (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK)
<strong>Mark Warren</strong> (University of British Columbia, Kanada)
Chair: <strong>Brigitte Geiẞel</strong> (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt)]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:24:04 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Basic Income]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/basic-income</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Chair : Guillaume Balas, MEP (S&amp;D) </p><p><br></p><p>Panellists:</p><ul><li>Dr Cemal Karakas, Policy Analyst, European Parliamentary Research Services, European Parliament</li><li>Stanislas Jourdan, Head of Positive Money Europe, Former Coordinator of the European Citizens’ Initiative for Basic Income and co-Founder of the French Movement for Basic Income</li><li>Sophie Swaton, University of Lausanne, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment, Author of “Pour un revenu de transition écologique” (2018)</li><li>Jeroen Van Ranst, CSC, Youth Officer for the Flemish part of Belgium</li><li>Ludovic Voet, CSC, Youth Officer for the French-speaking part of Belgium</li></ul>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:52:42 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Beyond GDP Growth]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/beyond-gdp-growth</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Chair, Helmut Scholz, MEP (GUE/NGL) </p><p><br></p><p>Panellists:</p><ul><li>Efi Achtsióglou, Greek Minister of Labour</li><li>Christian Felber, Economy for the Common Good</li><li>Leida Rijnhout, SDG Watch Steering Committee</li><li>Patrick ten Brink, European Environmental Bureau, Director of EU Policy</li><li>Joost Koorte, European Commission, DG EMPL, Director General</li></ul>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:56:25 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Technology, Growth & Sustainability]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/technology-growth-sustainability</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Chair : Florent Marcellesi, MEP (Greens/EFA) </p><p><br></p><p>Panellists:</p><ul><li>Guillaume Pitron, Author of “La guerre des métaux rares”</li><li>José Bellver, Researcher at FUHEM Ecosocial, Member of the Transitions Forum and the Inclusive Economy Group</li><li>Paul Hodson, European Commission, DG ENER, Energy Efficiency Unit</li><li>Doris Schroecker, European Commission, DG Industrial Technologies, Research and Innovation, Head of Strategy Unit</li></ul>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:06:31 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Trade & Environment]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/trade-environment</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Chair : Kathleen Van Brempt, MEP (S&amp;D) </p><p><br></p><p>Panellists:</p><ul><li>Fritz Hinterberger, Founding President of Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI)</li><li>Olivier de Schutter, Professor at the University of Louvain (Belgium) and at SciencesPo (Paris), former UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food (2008-2014)</li><li>Patrizia Heidegger, Global Policies Director at the EEB</li><li>Luisa Santos, Business Europe</li></ul>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Post Growth 2018 Conference]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:07:17 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Book Talk: Blockchain and the Law]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/book-talk-blockchain-and-the-law</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The book talk introduces Primavera De Filippi's and Aaron Wright's "Blockchain and the Law", which urges the legal systems to catch up with emerging technologies. That is because disintermediation—a blockchain’s greatest asset—subverts critical regulation. By cutting out middlemen, such as large online operators and multinational corporations, blockchains run the risk of undermining the capacity of governmental authorities to supervise activities in banking, commerce, law, and other vital areas.

De Filippi and Wright welcome the new possibilities inherent in blockchains. But as "Blockchain and the Law" makes clear, the technology cannot be harnessed productively without new rules and new approaches to legal thinking.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH <wzb@wzb.eu>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:09:10 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Speculative Urbanism and the New Volatility of City Life]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/speculative-urbanism-and-the-new-volatility-of-city-life</link>
                <description><![CDATA[UN-Habitat Director Joan Clos recently declared we would build more urban infrastructure in the next three decades than in all of human history. He was referring to an emergent global imperative to transform our cities into global (or green or smart) cities, as a necessary path to global sustainability. Michael Goldman will explain the origins of the global obsession with urban infrastructure, its transnational spread, and its relationship to the 2008 financial crisis and current regime of urban financialization. The talk will start with trends in Europe and the U.S., then focus on Michael Goldman’s research in India where housing and land dispossession, empty buildings and stalled infrastructure projects co-exist, municipalities have become bankrupt, and private equity firms are major landlords. A range of pressing issues will be discussed: Why has this happened and how are people resisting? Who will pay, who will use such “world-class” facilities? How will this infrastructure solve our most trenchant problems of poverty, inequality, and ecological distress?

<strong>Professor Michael Goldman</strong> teaches Sociology and Global Studies at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (USA), is currently the V.K.R.V. Chair Professor at the Institute for Social and Economic Change (Bangalore, India), author of Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization (Yale University Press), and is completing a book manuscript on speculative urbanism and the (un)making of global cities.

Comment: <strong>Prof. Dr. Sebastian Botzem</strong>, Universität Bremen and FU Berlin

Moderation: <strong>Dr. Tine Hanrieder</strong>, WZB]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH <wzb@wzb.eu>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:37:21 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Start-ups and Platforms: Regulating Labor in the Gig Economy]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/start-ups-and-platforms-regulating-labor-in-the-gig-economy</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Advocates of the platform economy present it as a new way of organizing work and value creation and as a fundamental and efficient alternative to the “old economy”. Traditional workplaces and employment are replaced by platforms organizing crowds of formally independent freelancers. There are huge platforms like Upwork which organize markets for freelancers in a large number of sectors. There are dedicated platforms which focus on specific markets. Companies like Uber or Deliveroo, for instance, offer mobility and transport services and compete with traditional transport providers. 99designs and similar platforms organize freelancers in the creative sector. There are platforms for medical services as well as for so-called microtasks, like categorization of images or writing of short texts. </p><p><br></p><p>While the services provided in the platform economy are very diverse, the platforms share several characteristics. They are multinational companies which offer their services in a number of countries. They all claim that they are not employers and present themselves as neutral mediators between customers und service providers. Workers in the platform economy have no employment relationships and therefore no social security and no entitlements like annual leave, sickness pay etc. Despite refusing responsibility for the workers, the platforms fulfill typical roles of employers like organizing and controlling the labor process. </p><p><br></p><p>We invite to discussing these questions together with: </p><p>- <strong>Steven Hill,</strong> journalist, lecturer and political professional based in the United States, is currently Journalist in Residence at the WZB. He is author of several books, with his latest being Die Startup Illusion: Wie die Internet-Ökonomie unseren Sozialstaat ruiniert (published in German) and Raw Deal: How the “Uber Economy” and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers, which was selected by The Globalist as one of the Top Ten Books of 2015. </p><p>- <strong>Sabine Pfeiffer:</strong> professor of sociology at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg. Her research deals with the relationship between technology and labor, in particular with the impact of the internet and digital technologies on workers, work organization, and skills. </p><p>- <strong>M. Six Silberman</strong>, project secretary, IG Metall. He is currently responsible for the trade union‘s projects aiming at organizing platform workers. He was one of the creators of Turkopticon, an online system supporting workers of the „Amazon Mechanical Turk“ platform.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH <wzb@wzb.eu>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:51:38 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Regulatory Challenges in Digital Markets: the Future of Artificial Intelligence for Policy Making]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/regulatory-challenges-in-digital-markets-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-for-policy-making</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The tremendous growth of digital transactions has profoundly affected the way we interact, opening vast opportunities to improve our lives. Consumers have benefited from an unprecedented proliferation of new services and products that previously were simply too costly to be developed and marketed to customers. These digital interactions create vast amounts of data. While firms are already using large-scale experiments and observational datasets to train algorithms to assist or even replace human decision-making, the use of artificial intelligence by governments is only starting out.</p><p>This year’s mini-conference focuses on the potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning for policy making. AI has begun to permeate many aspects of our lives, from the way we work and communicate to how we treat diseases. Governments' increasingly use algorithmic tools, for example in law enforcement or in making decisions about the allocation of resources and social benefits. While AI has enormous potential to increase the quality and efficiency of many goods and services, its use also entails legal, ethical, and consumer protection challenges that need to be carefully assessed. How can we effectively govern the use of machine learning algorithms for decision-making? How can we combine human skills and the strengths of algorithms to maximize societal gains? How can we ensure accountability, fairness, transparency, and the mitigation of potential biases due to algorithmic and human decision making? This mini-conference brings together leading experts to discuss the road ahead for using AI tools in public policy for the good of society.</p><p><strong>Sprecherinnen und Sprecher</strong></p><p><a href="https://dan.bjorkegren.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel Björkegren</a>&nbsp;<em>(Assistant Professor of Economics, Brown University)</em></p><p><a href="http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Joanna Bryson</a>&nbsp;<em>(Professor of Ethics and Technology, Hertie School of Governance)</em></p><p><a href="https://www.bundestag.de/abgeordnete/biografien/C/518880-518880" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Anna Christmann</a>&nbsp;<em>(Member of the German Bundestag, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen)</em></p><p><a href="https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10871/Sunstein" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Cass Sunstein</a>&nbsp;<em>(Robert Walmsley University Professor, Harvard University)</em></p><p>Moderated by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.diw.de/de/diw_01.c.428317.de/personen/ullrich__hannes.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Hannes Ullrich</a>&nbsp;<em>(DIW Berlin and University of Copenhagen)</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[German Institute for Economic Research]]></author>
                <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:04:42 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
