<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title><![CDATA[Beyond EVE: Events]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
        <language>de-DE</language>
        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 18:23:47 +0100</pubDate>

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[International Observatory on Information and Democracy (OID): A Major New Report on the State News Media, AI and Data Governance]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/international-observatory-on-information-and-democracy-oid-a-major-new-report-on-the-state-news-media-ai-and-data-governance</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>As part of the <a href="https://informationdemocracy.org/mission/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Forum on Information and Democracy</a>’s <strong>Global Dissemination month</strong><em>,</em> the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) is opening its doors for a special multi-stakeholder event. This gathering will bring together academics, activists, and policymakers for an exclusive showcase of the OID’s latest findings. The OID’s results will be presented by Professor Jeanette Hofmann and Professor Robin Mansel, followed by a “<a href="https://www.hiig.de/en/events/digitaler-salon-gespraechsklimawandel/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Digitaler Salon</a>” in the evening to publicly discuss key issues of information flows and the changing discourse climate, and the action necessary in different sectors.</p><p>After more than a year of work and a review of more than 3000 sources, the OID is launching its first meta-analysis. The report is set to provide a global understanding of the current structure of the information and communication space and its impact on public debate and democracy around the world.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 18:23:47 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Informing Ourselves to Death: Conspiracy and Fantasy in Postmodern Russia]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/informing-ourselves-to-death-conspiracy-and-fantasy-in-postmodern-russia</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the USSR, information was a scarce resource shared only sparingly with the population at large; now Russians are awash in a flood of information. Yet each scenario proved conducive to unfettered suspicion and widespread conspiracy theorizing. Now the Russian media encourage viewers to believe they are surrounded by enemies who want to brainwash them with propaganda. Post-Soviet conspiracy theories peddle heroic fantasies of a victimized nation and contradictory messages about the nature of human subjectivity.</p><p><strong>Eliot Borenstein</strong> ist Professor für Russistik und Slawistik an der New York University. Unter seinen vielfach ausgezeichneten Publikationen zur politischen Medienkultur Russlands finden sich zuletzt »Overkill: Sex and Violence in Contemporary Russian Popular Culture« [2007], »Plots against Russia: Conspiracy and Fantasy after Socialism« [2019] und »Pussy Riot: Speaking Punk to Power« [2020]. Demnächst erscheint seine Monographie zu viralen Netzphänomenen in Russland mit dem Titel »Meanwhile in Russia…: Russian Internet Memes and Viral Video«. Borenstein ist zudem Herausgeber des Blogs »All the Russians« für das NYU Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia«.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:35:09 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Improve health with behavioral economics]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/improve-health-with-behavioral-economics</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A new panacea?</em></p><p>Why is it so hard to get rid of unhealthy behavior? According to the theory of behavioral health economics, unhealthy behaviors are partly due to cognitive biases that adversely affect decision-making. The corresponding public health strategy is to identify these biases and design interventions that address them. Based on practical examples like diabetes management or physical activity, we discuss successful health promotion strategies based on the combined insights of economics and psychology.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This event is organized by the Department of Socioeconomics</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 20:38:36 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Never apologise, never explain: (How) can AI rebuild trust after conflicts?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/never-apologise-never-explain-how-can-ai-rebuild-trust-after-conflicts</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Algorithms – and the actors behind them – are surveying and impacting ever more dimensions of our modern lives. They recommend which movies to watch; they calculate risk appropriate credit scores; and they play a role in meting out “just” punishment; to only name a few areas. At the same time, they correct imperfect human decisions and add new informational dimensions to decisions prior&nbsp;impossible. To assess and evaluate the impeding transformations of normative orders in a predictive society, we approach algorithms in light of the juxtaposition of trust and control. Why and under which conditions do – or don’t – we trust algorithms? Indeed, can and should we trust them? Especially because their algorithmic normativity was (not) produced in justificatory fora where trust is brought about in and through social conflicts? But then, how much trust – if any – should algorithms put into us as citizens? For example, do they have to presume us non-dangerous and harmless? Vice versa, how much control do we need to retain over algorithms? And how much control should they exert over us? Can we use algorithms to control the effect of algorithms and thus create a meta-level of trust? Especially in order to negate, or as a matter of fact: to entertain, the freedom to deviate in the algorithmic society?</p><p><strong>Prof. Burkhard Schäfer</strong> (University of Edinburgh, Professor of Computational Legal Theory)</p><p>Opening Remarks by <strong>Prof. Enrico Schleiff</strong> (President of Goethe University)</p><p>Opening Remarks by <strong>Prof. Rainer Forst</strong> (Speaker of ConTrust and Normative Orders)</p><p>Welcoming Remarks &amp; Comment <strong>Prof. Klaus Günther</strong> (Dean of the Faculty of Law Goethe University)</p><p>Convenors: <strong>Prof. Christoph Burchard</strong> (Goethe University, Professor of Criminal Justice, PI of ConTrust and "Normative Orders") and <strong>Prof. Indra Spiecker gen. Döhmann</strong> (Goethe University, Professor of Public Law, PI of ConTrust)</p><p><strong>Presented by:</strong></p><p>Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, "ConTrust" - ein Clusterprojekt des Landes Hessen, Frankfurter Gespräche zum Informationsrecht des Lehrstuhls für Öffentliches Recht, Umweltrecht, Informationsrecht und Verwaltungswissenschaften und Zentrum verantwortungsbewusste Digitalisierung</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:54:17 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What Economics and Economic History can learn from Memory Studies]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/what-economics-and-economic-history-can-learn-from-memory-studies</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>How are individual and collective memories of extreme economic moments produced in a community? How do these memories translate into the political economy and shape the realm of possibility of macroeconomic policies? Why is some statistical data and economic policy represented more factual than others in the historical narration of national economies? How do some economic indicators become more powerful symbolic frameworks than others and receive different degrees of affective intensity? How can methods and key concepts of memory studies inform and enrich the historical and economic analysis related to these questions?</p><p>The Workshop is organised by Stephanie Ettmeier and Marie Huber, Post Doctoral Research Fellow in Global History at the HU Berlin. Taking our own research projects – dealing with the postcolonial economy of Francophone West Africa, and the recovery of the German economy from the Great Depression under the Nazis from 1933 onwards, respectively – as a starting point, we want to invite others working on economic experiences and expectations to discuss these questions with us. In a critical thinking and discussion focused workshop format, we want to strengthen interdisciplinary conversation and provide methodological impulses for a broad range of research topics.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Keynote Lectures</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.ifeas.uni-mainz.de/files/2019/10/CV-Roeschenthaler.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ute Röschenthaler</a>, Universität Mainz, will give a keynote lecture and provide valuable input during the discussions.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[German Institute for Economic Research]]></author>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:15:08 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Just One More Thing]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/just-one-more-thing</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A. L. Kennedy is a Scottish author of numerous novels, essays, and newspaper columns, with occasional appearances as a stand-up comedian; most of her novels have been translated into German, most recently: "Das Blaue Buch" [2014]", "Gleißendes Glück" [2016], "Leises Schlängeln" [2016], "Süßer Ernst" [2018], in 2020 her short story collection "We are Attempting to Survive Our Time" was published; her columns appear in the "Guardian" and most recently, on the 'Brexit disaster' also in the "Süddeutsche Zeitung"; in Germany she received, among others. In Germany, she has received the Heinrich Heine Prize from the city of Düsseldorf.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:03:44 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Iyad Rahwan: How to trust machines?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/iyad-rahwan-how-to-trust-machines</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Machine intelligence plays a growing role in our lives. Today, machines recommend things to us, such as news, music, and household products. They trade in our stock markets and optimise our transportation and logistics. They are also beginning to drive us around, play with our children, diagnose our health. How do we ensure that these machines will be trustworthy? This lecture explores various psychological, social, cultural, and political factors that shape our trust in machines and pleads for the accomplishment of the challenges of the information revolution not only to be understood as a problem of computer science.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Iyad Rahwan</strong> is director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, where he founded and leads the Center for Humans and Machines. He is also an honorary professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Technische Universität Berlin. Until June 2020, he was an Associate Professor of Media Arts &amp; Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Rahwan holds a PhD in Information Systems (Artificial Intelligence) from the University of Melbourne, Australia. His work lies at the intersection of computer science and human behavior, with a focus on collective intelligence, large-scale cooperation, and the societal impact of artificial intelligence and social media. In addition to various journal articles, Iyad Rahwan is co-author of the study <em>Reply to: Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles</em> and together with Jean-François Bonnefon he published the paper <em>Machine Thinking, Fast and Slow</em> (both 2020).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>The event will be held in English. </strong></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anger and its Interaction with Love and Hate]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/anger-and-its-interaction-with-love-and-hate</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has anger become such a dominant theme in today's world that people have even spoken of an "age of anger"? Is it conceivable that this emotionalization could also have a positive effect, under what conditions? In terms of the history of philosophy and religion, two approaches to this topic can be identified. On the one hand, a complete rejection, in Buddhism, for example, and in Stoicism; on the other hand, the approving qualification of anger as a virtue, under special circumstances, for example, in Aristoteles and Thomas von Aquin. Absolute negation has a detrimental effect when certain sensations are so excluded, including positively experienced sensations. Essentially, two causes can be identified for the increasing affliction by anger in our society. On the one hand, the evaporation of traditional as well as new values; on the other hand, the all too arbitrary expression of anger in the social media. In addition, it has the effect that more and more anger-filled protest actions, of youth, of women, show a challenge to traditional specifications. Meanwhile, anger as a popular and triumphant affect misses the mark. A binding, moral force can only emerge when anger gains coherence, in its sustainability, intensity, and reach. Otherwise, anger becomes destructive rage.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Aaron Ben-Ze'ev</strong> is a professor of philosophy at the University of Haifa (Israel), of which he was president for many years; research in social philosophy, perception theory, and everyday psychology; numerous publications on the historical and contemporary politics of emotions, including "Love Online: Emotions on the Internet" (2004), "The Logic of Emotions. A Critique of Emotional Intelligence" (2009), "The Arc of Love. How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time" (2019).</p><p><em>Introduction and talk: Ethel Matala de Mazza</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Mosse Lectures <info@mosse-lectures.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:57:36 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anger and its Interaction with Love and Hate]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/anger-and-its-interaction-with-love-and-hate-2</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has anger become such a dominant theme in today's world that people have even spoken of an "age of anger"? Is it conceivable that this emotionalization could also have a positive effect, under what conditions? In terms of the history of philosophy and religion, two approaches to this topic can be identified. On the one hand, a complete rejection, in Buddhism, for example, and in Stoicism; on the other hand, the approving qualification of anger as a virtue, under special circumstances, for example, in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Absolute negation has a detrimental effect when certain sensations are so excluded, including positively experienced sensations. Essentially, two causes can be identified for the increasing affliction by anger in our society. On the one hand, the evaporation of traditional as well as new values; on the other hand, the all too arbitrary expression of anger in the social media. In addition, it has the effect that more and more anger-filled protest actions, of youth, of women, show a challenge to traditional specifications. Meanwhile, anger as a popular and triumphant affect misses the mark. A binding, moral force can only emerge when anger gains coherence, in its sustainability, intensity, and reach. Otherwise, anger becomes destructive rage.</p><p><br></p><p>Aaron Ben-Ze'ev is professor of philosophy at the University of Haifa (Israel), of which he was president for many years; research in social philosophy, perception theory, and everyday psychology; numerous publications on the historical and contemporary politics of emotions, including "Love Online: Emotions on the Internet" (2004), "The Logic of Emotions. A Critique of Emotional Intelligence" (2009), "The Arc of Love. How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time" (2019).</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:44:18 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Joanna Bryson: The role of humans in an age of intelligent machines]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/joanna-bryson-the-role-of-humans-in-an-age-of-intelligent-machines</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and the information age are bringing us more information about ourselves and each other than any society has ever known. Yet at the same time it brings machines seemingly more capable of every human endeavour than any human can be. What are the limits of AI? Of intelligence and humanity more broadly? What are our ethical obligations to machines? Do these alter our obligations to each other? What is the basis of our social obligations?</p><p>In her lecture Joanna Bryson will argue that there are really only two problems humanity has to solve: sustainability and inequality, or put another way: security and power. Or put a third way: how big of a pie can we make, and how do we slice up that pie? Life is not a zero-sum game. We use the security of sociality to construct public goods where everyone benefits. But still, every individual needs enough pie to thrive, and this is the challenge of inequality. Joanna Bryson will argue that understanding these processes answers the questions above. She will then look at how AI is presently affecting both these problems. </p><p><br></p><p><strong>Joanna J Bryson</strong>, Professor of Ethics and Technology at Hertie School, is an academic recognised for broad expertise on intelligence, its nature, and its consequences. She advises governments, transnational agencies, and NGOs globally, particularly in AI policy. She holds two degrees each in psychology and AI (BA Chicago, MSc &amp; MPhil Edinburgh, PhD MIT). Her work has appeared in venues ranging from reddit to the journal Science. She continues to research both the systems engineering of AI and the cognitive science of intelligence, with present focuses on the impact of technology on human cooperation, and new models of governance for AI and ICT. </p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:15:09 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Diversity, Inc.]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/diversity-inc</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<strong>Pamela Newkirk - Diversity, Inc.: The Failed Promise of a Billion-Dollar Business —In Conversation with Jonathan Capehart</strong>

In her latest book Newkirk, a journalist, professor of journalism at New York University and author of the award-winning Spectacle and Within the Veil, tracks the efforts of three predominantly white elite industries —Hollywood, corporate America, and academia— to diversify their operations. While these businesses and institutions have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on studies, programs, and training, their efforts have largely been unsuccessful; Google, for instance, invested $265 million on a plan for diversifying the workforce but the initiative left their percentage of Black employees untouched at 2%. In her incisive analysis, Newkirk shows where these programs failed and suggests better ways to achieve the goals.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Politics and Prose Bookstore]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:25:45 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Defective computing: How algorithms use speech analysis to profile job candidates]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/technicalarticles/defective-computing-how-algorithms-use-speech-analysis-to-profile-job-candidates</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some companies and scientists present Affective Computing, the algorithmic analysis of personality traits also known as “artificial emotional intelligence”, as an important new development. But the methods that are used are often dubious and present serious risks for discrimination.</strong></p><p><strong>It was announced with some fanfare that Alexa and others would soon demonstrate breakthroughs in the field of emotion analysis. Much is written about affective computing, but products are far from market ready. For example, Amazon’s emotion assistant </strong><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-23/amazon-is-working-on-a-wearable-device-that-reads-human-emotions" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dylan</a> is said to be able to read human emotions just by listening to their voices. However, Dylan currently only exists in form of a patent.</p><p>So far, Amazon, Google et al. have not launched such products. Identifying unique signals that indicate that someone is sad seems to be a bit more complicated than they initially thought. Maybe someone’s voice sounds depressed because they are depressed, but maybe they are just tired or exhausted.</p><p>However, these difficulties do not prevent other companies from launching products that claim to have solved these complex problems by using voice and speech for character and personality analysis.</p><p>In Germany, two examples spring to mind. One is the company Precire, based in Aachen, a city on border with Belgium. Their idea: you record a voice sample, and based on the person’s choice of words, sentence structure and many other indicators, the software then produces an analysis of their character traits. The software can be used in staff recruitment or to identify candidates for promotion.</p><p>The company states that its software carries out the analysis based on a 15-minute language sample. The then CEO Mario Reis stated in an <a href="https://blog.recrutainment.de/2016/05/11/persoenlichkeitsprofil-aus-der-analyse-von-sprache-einfach-nur-creepy-oder-die-technologie-von-morgen-interview-mit-mario-reis-von-psyware-und-britta-nollmann-von-randstad/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">interview</a> in 2016 that the results were based on science and scientifically tested. This statement is repeated in <a href="https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658187705" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">a book</a> published in 2018. This book also cites additional studies and findings to further support the scientific grounding of the method.</p><p><em>By Veronika Thiel</em></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[AlgorithmWatch gGmbH <info@algorithmwatch.org>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:26:38 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Global Mental Health in the Era of Sustainable Development: Research and Policy Priorities]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/global-mental-health-in-the-era-of-sustainable-development-research-and-policy-priorities</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Mental health is described by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a state of well-being in which the individual is aware of his or her own abilities, can tolerate normal stress levels, function productively in the place of work and is able to contribute to their community. Mental disorders comprise a wide range of mental and behavioural disorders such as depression, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and dementia.</p><p><br></p><p>The Leopoldina and the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) will organize the symposium “Global Mental Health in the Era of Sustainable Development: Research and Policy Priorities” from 30 to 31 May 2019 in Pretoria, South Africa, in order to discuss recent advances in mental health research. The participants will explore topics ranging from neuroscience and genetics to public mental health and epidemiology as well as intervention research. </p><p><br></p><p>The scientific coordinators of the symposium are <strong>Professor Frank Rösler</strong> ML, University of Hamburg, on the side of Leopoldina, and <strong>Professor Crick Lund</strong>, University of Cape Town, on the side of ASSAf. The event is open for everyone interested. </p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina <leopoldina@leopoldina.org>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:27:39 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/biased-uncovering-the-hidden-prejudice</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<strong>Jennifer L. Eberhardt - Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do</strong>

Eberhardt, a professor of psychology at Stanford, is one of the foremost experts on unconscious racial bias. Her important new book draws on research—both in the lab and in real-world contexts such as courtrooms, prisons, boardrooms, and on the street—and her own experience to show that you don’t have to be racist to be biased. Nearly all of us are biased, she argues, however much we believe in equality. Tracing bias through all level of society, Eberhardt illustrates how it affects representations and interactions in the media, education, and business. But because these inherent prejudices are in some sense a basic part of human nature, Eberhardt, named one of Foreign Policy’s 100 Leading Global Thinkers, believes that we can work together to eradicate them.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Politics and Prose Bookstore]]></author>
                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 18:49:44 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Brain Power for Sustainable Development]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/brain-power-for-sustainable-development</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The adoption of the 2030 Agenda was a landmark achievement for the United Nations, providing for a shared global vision on sustainable development. The scale and ambition of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals are unprecedented and require new and innovative approaches. </p><p><br></p><p>A better understanding of the cognitive dimensions of human agents in their individual and collective behavior could be the key to implementing the different goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda in a coordinated manner. The symposium addresses the question of how to strengthen “brain power” for sustainable development and aims at identifying the cognitive preconditions for a successful sustainability transition.</p><p><br></p><p>With this symposium, Leopoldina continues the dialogue between science and politics on sustainability and builds on the symposium “The Turn to Sustainability?”, which was held in Berlin in October 2016.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina <leopoldina@leopoldina.org>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2021 15:00:35 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
