<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title><![CDATA[Beyond EVE: Events]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[https://beyond-eve.com/events/rss]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
        <language>de-DE</language>
        <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:18:04 +0200</pubDate>

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Preparing for a Fascist America]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/preparing-for-a-fascist-america</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The ongoing coup against American democracy raises serious concerns for democracy worldwide. In this talk, Stanley argues that the history of the United States, as well as its present situation, justifies these concerns. More specifically, Stanley argues that the anti-democratic form that is emerging in the United States is a kind of racial fascism. Europe should prepare for the possibility of a fascist United States.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/jason-stanley" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Jason Stanley</strong></a> is the Jacob Urowsky Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. The author of <em>Know How, Languages in Context, Knowledge and Practical Interests</em> and <em>How Propaganda Works</em> also writes for publications including <em>The New York Times</em>, <em>The Washington Post</em>, <em>The Boston Review</em>, <em>The Guardian</em> and <em>Project Syndicate</em>. He is currently working with David Beaver on the forthcoming book <em>Politics of Language: An Essay in Non-Ideal Theory,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;during his stay as IWM Visiting Fellow, on&nbsp;<em>Fascism as a Social Kind</em> together with Susanna Siegel.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/node/330" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Marci Shore</strong></a>, Associate Professor at the Department of History at Yale University and IWM Visiting Fellow, will introduce the speaker and moderate the discussion.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:12:26 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Courage: A Conceptual History]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/courage-a-conceptual-history</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Courage has always been a central virtue in the Western ethical tradition, but its meaning has changed considerably over time. In antiquity, courage signified fearlessness in the face of bodily injury and death, whether passively endured (like Socrates and Christ) or actively risked (like Achilles and Alexander the Great).</p><p>Today, however, such "physical courage", as it is called, tends to be depreciated in favor of "moral courage", defined by Sidgwick as a readiness to “face the pains and dangers of social disapproval in the performance of what one believes to be one’s duty”.</p><p>Why did this shift occur, and what is its significance for the future of courage? These were the questions Skidelsky addressed in his talk.</p><p><a href="https://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/sociology/staff/skidelsky/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Edward Skidelsky</strong></a>, University of Exeter, co-author of <em>How Much is Enough? Money and the Good Life</em>.</p><p> Commentator: <a href="https://www.iwm.at/node/310" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Aner Barzilay</strong></a>, independent researcher and Visiting Fellow at the IWM.</p><p> Introduction: <a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/ludger-hagedorn" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Ludger Hagedorn</strong></a>, Permanent Fellow at the IWM.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:18:04 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[In AI We Trust. Power, Illusion and Control of Predictive Algorithms]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/in-ai-we-trust-power-illusion-and-control-of-predictive-algorithms</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The inaugural Yehuda Elkana Fellow, Helga Nowotny, gave a lecture at the Central European University, in cooperation with the IWM and the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard College.&nbsp;The lecture was preceded by a ceremony to commemorate Yehuda Elkana.</p><p>As we move into a world in which algorithms, robots, and avatars play an ever-increasing role, we need to better understand the nature of AI and its implications for human agency. Helga Nowotny argues that at the heart of our trust in AI lies a paradox: we leverage AI to increase control over the future and uncertainty, while at the same time the performativity of AI, the power it has to make us act in the ways it predicts, reduces our agency over the future.</p><p>These developments also challenge the narrative of progress, which played such a central role in modernity and is based on the hubris of total control. We are now moving into an era where this control is limited as AI monitors our actions, posing the threat of surveillance, but also offering the opportunity to reappropriate control and transform it into care.</p><p><a href="https://www.iwm.at/fellow/helga-nowotny" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Helga Nowotny</a> is one of the most prominent scholars in science studies worldwide, an area that counted Yehuda Elkana as one of its pioneers and promoters. For several decades Helga Nowotny has been one of the most influential institution builders in European higher education and research. She has worked with European intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations and bodies, such as the European Science Foundation, governmental agencies in several countries of East and West as well as independent organizations and committees of scholars. She has taken part in or directly led, the design and establishment of innovative new institutions, such as the European Research Council, Collegium Budapest or Central European University.</p><p>The Yehuda Elkana Fellow’s activities are held in partnership with Bard College through the Open Society University Network and supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 16:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Center for Humanities and Social Change]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/center-for-humanities-and-social-change</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Humanities and Social Change at the Humboldt University in Berlin focuses on the crises of capitalism and democracy. The Center’s aim is to analyse our present situation and to provide and refine the fundamental conceptual tools that guide such analyses. With its broad thematic focus, the center takes into account the relationship between economy, society, and politics – and the potential tensions of even contradictions created here.</p><p>The Center’s work is guided by social philosophy and oriented towards the project of a critical theory of society. It also draws from the specific resources the humanities have to offer. “Democracy” is then not only understood as a form of government, nor is “capitalism” understood as a mere economic formation. Instead, both are treated in a broad sense as a complex <em>ensemble</em> of social institutions and practices or as socio-cultural life forms.</p><p>Based on the programme of the early Critical Theory, the task of the Center can be described as follows: By giving society a space for reflection and by fathoming possible courses of action, the analysis of crises is the “theoretical side of the practical process of emancipation.”</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Center for Humanities and Social Change <susann.schmeisser@hu-berlin.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 16:36:02 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Iyad Rahwan: How to trust machines?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/iyad-rahwan-how-to-trust-machines</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Machine intelligence plays a growing role in our lives. Today, machines recommend things to us, such as news, music, and household products. They trade in our stock markets and optimise our transportation and logistics. They are also beginning to drive us around, play with our children, diagnose our health. How do we ensure that these machines will be trustworthy? This lecture explores various psychological, social, cultural, and political factors that shape our trust in machines and pleads for the accomplishment of the challenges of the information revolution not only to be understood as a problem of computer science.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Iyad Rahwan</strong> is director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, where he founded and leads the Center for Humans and Machines. He is also an honorary professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Technische Universität Berlin. Until June 2020, he was an Associate Professor of Media Arts &amp; Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Rahwan holds a PhD in Information Systems (Artificial Intelligence) from the University of Melbourne, Australia. His work lies at the intersection of computer science and human behavior, with a focus on collective intelligence, large-scale cooperation, and the societal impact of artificial intelligence and social media. In addition to various journal articles, Iyad Rahwan is co-author of the study <em>Reply to: Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles</em> and together with Jean-François Bonnefon he published the paper <em>Machine Thinking, Fast and Slow</em> (both 2020).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>The event will be held in English. </strong></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)  <info@hiig.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[GIGA Research Data Service]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/giga-research-data-service</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The GIGA researchers generate a large number of qualitative and quantitative research data. On this page you will find descriptions of this research data ("metadata") as well as information about the available access options. To facilitate its reuse, and to enhance research transparency, a large part of the GIGA research data is published in <a href="https://datorium.gesis.org/xmlui/?locale-attribute=en" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">datorium</a>, a repository hosted by the GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Our objective is to offer free access to as much of our data as possible, to guarantee the possibility of its citation, and to secure its safe storage. Metadata of research data that cannot be published open access due to its sensitivity is also shown on this page. For the handling of research data, the GIGA has drafted a <a href="https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/research-data-policy-of-the-giga" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Research Data Policy</a>, effective since December 2017 for all GIGA team members.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[GIGA Research Data Service <jan.lueth@giga-hamburg.de>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:16:16 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/organisations/the-institute-for-human-sciences</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences (IWM) is an independent institute for advanced study in the humanities and social sciences. Since its foundation in 1982, it has promoted intellectual exchange between East and West, between academia and society, and between a variety of disciplines and schools of thought. In this way, the IWM has become a vibrant center of intellectual life in Vienna.

In the early days, the Institute primarily sought to reintegrate the ideas and experiences of Eastern Europe into Western debates following decades of isolation. This goal remains of crucial importance even more than 25 years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, as old and new boundaries between East and West continue to shape beliefs, attitudes and institutions. Under Shalini Randeria, who took over as IWM Rector in 2015, the Institute is now expanding its geographical purview to include not only Central and Eastern Europe and North America, but also Asia and the Global South.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:48 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anger and its Interaction with Love and Hate]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/anger-and-its-interaction-with-love-and-hate-2</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has anger become such a dominant theme in today's world that people have even spoken of an "age of anger"? Is it conceivable that this emotionalization could also have a positive effect, under what conditions? In terms of the history of philosophy and religion, two approaches to this topic can be identified. On the one hand, a complete rejection, in Buddhism, for example, and in Stoicism; on the other hand, the approving qualification of anger as a virtue, under special circumstances, for example, in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Absolute negation has a detrimental effect when certain sensations are so excluded, including positively experienced sensations. Essentially, two causes can be identified for the increasing affliction by anger in our society. On the one hand, the evaporation of traditional as well as new values; on the other hand, the all too arbitrary expression of anger in the social media. In addition, it has the effect that more and more anger-filled protest actions, of youth, of women, show a challenge to traditional specifications. Meanwhile, anger as a popular and triumphant affect misses the mark. A binding, moral force can only emerge when anger gains coherence, in its sustainability, intensity, and reach. Otherwise, anger becomes destructive rage.</p><p><br></p><p>Aaron Ben-Ze'ev is professor of philosophy at the University of Haifa (Israel), of which he was president for many years; research in social philosophy, perception theory, and everyday psychology; numerous publications on the historical and contemporary politics of emotions, including "Love Online: Emotions on the Internet" (2004), "The Logic of Emotions. A Critique of Emotional Intelligence" (2009), "The Arc of Love. How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time" (2019).</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:44:18 +0200</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-normative-order-of-the-internet-a-theory-of-rule-and-regulation-online</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>There is order on the internet, but how has this order emerged and what challenges will threaten and shape its future? This study shows how a legitimate order of norms has emerged online, through both national and international legal systems. It establishes the emergence of a normative order of the internet, an order which explains and justifies processes of online rule and regulation. This order integrates norms at three different levels (regional, national, international), of two types (privately and publicly authored), and of different character (from ius cogens to technical standards). Matthias C. Kettemann assesses their internal coherence, their consonance with other order norms and their consistency with the order's finality. The normative order of the internet is based on and produces a liquefied system characterized by self-learning normativity. In light of the importance of the socio-communicative online space, this is a book for anyone interested in understanding the contemporary development of the internet. <strong>Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann</strong>, LL.M. (Harvard), Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Insitut Hamburg, Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität Um Anmeldung wird gebeten. Die Veranstaltung wird virtuell über GoToMeeting stattfinden. </p><p><br></p><p>Die Einwahldaten werden nach der Anmeldung übermittelt. Oxford University Press 2020 Veranstalter: Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut, Sustainable Computing Lab, WU Wien, Humboldt-Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft (HIIG) und Oxford University Press</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:43:34 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Algorithmic Knowledge Production – Principles, Problems, Prospects]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/algorithmic-knowledge-production-principles-problems-prospects</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The conference will discuss basic principles and problems of algorithmic knowledge production in contemporary science and society. Witnessed by most recent breakthrough research, quantum algorithms introduce new ways of processing information entirely at variance with traditional classical computation. Also, algorithms are now utilized in proving mathematical theorems. This forces us to scrutinize the notion of understanding and even to ask what this actually means for artificial and natural intelligence. In addition to such basic issues, the conference addresses concrete and specific applications: automated decision making and its legal consequences, the successes of machine learning in medical diagnostics, and the influence of speedy algorithms on financial markets and other areas of economics.

mit:
Prof. Dr. Joachim Buhmann (ETH Zürich)
Dr. Liesbeth de Mol (Université de Lille)
Prof. Dr. Markus Gabriel (Universität Bonn)
Prof. Dr. Renato Renner (ETH Zürich)
Prof. Dr. Florent Thouvenin (Universität Zürich)
Prof. Dr. Josef Teichmann (ETH Zürich)]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Collegium Helveticum]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:40:12 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Understanding the Challenges of Plant Science: Reflections from the Outside-In]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/understanding-the-challenges-of-plant-science-reflections-from-the-outside-in</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The investigation of plant intelligence and sentience is here to stay. And yet, despite the growing body of literature on the subject, we appear not to be making headway. Controversies over plant intelligent behavior and consciousness are part of a long botanical tradition. But things are only getting worse in today’s academic culture of “fast science”. The result is a lack of a common language and subsequent misunderstandings and misdiagnoses. Many findings that have gripped the public’s imagination are proving difficult to replicate. I will illustrate how the experimental evidence on plant perception and learning brings a mixed bag of both supportive and inconclusive results. Doing better calls for placing the discussion outside of old and sterile battles, allowing for alternative frameworks of thinking. Doing better calls for the inclusion of counterarguments and adversarial collaboration; for respecting the guiding role that complementary, rather than competing, models and theoretical frameworks can play. Doing better calls for “slow science” and, echoing Ludwik Fleck, for the nourishment of social interactions in both the plant and cognitive science communities. </p><p><br></p><p>The goal of this talk is not to claim that plants are intelligent or that plant sentience (if it exists) is of the same kind as human consciousness. Neither taking for granted that plants are intelligent and/or sentient, nor dismissing the possibility that they are, I shall argue that the time is ripe to cast the problem in a scientifically tractable manner. The goal is to invite constructive debate, and to scrutinize established objections and thinking vetoes to better understand the challenges of plant science. <strong>Paco Calvo is a Professor of Philosophy of Science</strong>, and Principal Investigator of MINTLab (Minimal Intelligence Lab) at the University of Murcia (Spain). He specialized in the philosophy of cognitive science courtesy of a Fulbright scholarship in the late 1990s (University of California, San Diego), and received a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Glasgow (UK) in 2000. His research interests range broadly within the cognitive sciences, with special emphasis on ecological psychology, embodied cognitive science, and plant intelligence. </p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Collegium Helveticum]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:21:02 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Remains of the Real]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-remains-of-the-real</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>There was a moment in the 1990’s, in the era of high postmodernism, when it seemed that social reality has had no stable foundations and as such it can be freely and totally transformed by interventions in the registers of symbols and images. Various social, political and economic developments of the last two decades – from 9/11 terrorist attacks to the 2008 financial crisis to the recent populist uprisings on both sides of the Atlantic – blatantly contradict that over-optimist conviction. A lot has been said about what the populists get wrong, what is, however, more puzzling is that they seem to get some things right – as if people had a sort of political blindsight or – to put it in more philosophical terms – as if there was some kind of basic social and political unconcealedness/disclosure (alētheia) where the truth shines through the curtain of lies. </p><p><br></p><p><strong>Jan Sowa</strong> is an Associate Professor at the Academy of Fine Arts, Warsaw. From January to June 2020 he is a Visiting Fellow at the IWM.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:19:34 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Europe After the Pandemic]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/europe-after-the-pandemic</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The future of Europe after the crisis caused by COVID-19 according to <strong>Ivan Krastev</strong>, political scientist, IWM Permanent Fellow and president of the Centre of Liberal Strategies in Sofia, and <strong>Jordi Vaquer,</strong> political analyst of the Open Society Initiative for Europe. Conversation in Catalan and English, with subtitles in Catalan and Spanish.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:18:22 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Dangers of Digital Democracy]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/the-dangers-of-digital-democracy</link>
                <description><![CDATA[All over the world, elections are manipulated by fake news, public opinion is radicalized via social media and electronic voting processes are subject to hacker attacks. The Internet was once seen as an opportunity for more democracy, but today concerns about the future of free elections prevail. Eric Frey, editor of Der Standard, will speak with his guests about the transformation of mass media and the (in)steerability of the Internet.

Franco Berardi, author, media theorist and media activist
Ingrid Brodnig, journalist and author
John Frank, Vice-President EU Government Affairs, Microsoft
Eric Frey (Moderator), editor, Der Standard

A cooperation of Burgtheater, ERSTE Foundation, IWM and DER STANDARD]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:16:11 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Diversity, Inc.]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/diversity-inc</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<strong>Pamela Newkirk - Diversity, Inc.: The Failed Promise of a Billion-Dollar Business —In Conversation with Jonathan Capehart</strong>

In her latest book Newkirk, a journalist, professor of journalism at New York University and author of the award-winning Spectacle and Within the Veil, tracks the efforts of three predominantly white elite industries —Hollywood, corporate America, and academia— to diversify their operations. While these businesses and institutions have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on studies, programs, and training, their efforts have largely been unsuccessful; Google, for instance, invested $265 million on a plan for diversifying the workforce but the initiative left their percentage of Black employees untouched at 2%. In her incisive analysis, Newkirk shows where these programs failed and suggests better ways to achieve the goals.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Politics and Prose Bookstore]]></author>
                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:25:45 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Crypto-Politics. Encryption and Democratic Practices in the Digital Era]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/crypto-politics-encryption-and-democratic-practices-in-the-digital-era</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The volume centres on the debates on digital encryption in Germany and the USA, during the aftermath of Edward Snowden’s leaks, which revolved around the value of privacy and the legitimacy of surveillance practices. Using a discourse analysis of mass media and specialist debates, it shows how these are closely interlinked with technological controversies and how, as a result, contestation emerges not within one public sphere but within multiple expert circles. The book develops the notion of ‘publicness’ in order to grasp the political significance of these controversies, thereby making an innovative contribution to Critical Security Studies by introducing digital encryption as an important site for understanding the broader debates on cyber security and surveillance.</p><p><br></p><p>Mit:<strong> Dr. Linda Monsees</strong> (Autorin, Postdoktorandin am Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen"), <strong>Prof. Peter Burgess</strong> (Professor and Chair of Geopolitics of Risk at the Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris) und <strong>Prof. Dr. Nicole Deitelhoff</strong> (Direktorin des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Principal Investigator des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen", Professorin für Internationale Beziehungen und Theorien globaler Ordnungen der Goethe-Universität)</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Rethinking Responsibility]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/rethinking-responsibility</link>
                <description><![CDATA[After the publication of Hans Jonas' <strong>Das Prinzip Verantwortung</strong> forty years ago, the principle of responsibility has become a key concept in moral and political debates. Yet the unconditional responsibility for the possibility of the existence of future generations – not only of humans, but also of other living beings – is invariably accompanied by the "heuristics of fear," which presupposes imagining the worst-case scenario and a pronouncedly bleak future. The dystopian principle of responsibility was introduced as a response to Bloch's Das Prinzip Hoffnung, which envisions the possibility of a utopian future for humanity. The proposed project will discuss these two principles and will argue that they are not mutually exclusive, so that, while still preserving the imperative of responsibility, one can maintain a utopian ideal as a regulative idea for moral and political action.

<strong>Dmitri Nikulin</strong> ist Professor für Philosophie an der New School for Social Research in New York. Von August ‒ Oktober 2019 ist er auf Einladung von Professor Rainer Forst und dem Exzellenzcluster »Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen« Fellow am Forschungskolleg Humanwissenschaften der Goethe-Universität.

Um Anmeldung bis zum 14. Oktober 2019 wird gebeten]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Normative Orders <office@normativeorders.net>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:00:02 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Social Networks or Social Nightmares?]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/social-networks-or-social-nightmares</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago social networks, big data and artificial intelligence were welcomed for their promise of progress and democratization of access. Today, the focus has shifted to their dark side as a threat to our privacy, a danger to democracy and as a new form of surveillance. Three of the world’s leading activists of the electronic age gather to discuss our digital future. <strong>Roger McNamee</strong>, an early advisor to Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg, has become one of his fiercest critics – his much-acclaimed book Zucked is a far-reaching indictment of the way the social media giant is dealing with data security. <strong>Evgeny Morozov</strong> gained prominence with his book The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom, a prophetically early warning about the dangers of the digital age. <strong>Max Schrems</strong>, Austrian data protection lawyer, became a world-wide celebrity for launching the first successful legal challenge against Facebook for privacy violations. The conversation is led by IWM Rector <strong>Shalini Randeria.</strong></p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:15:22 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[American Diplomacy in a Disordered World]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/american-diplomacy-in-a-disordered-world</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the fifth event of the series “Geopolitical Talks” <strong>IWM Permanent Fellow Ivan Krastev</strong> will talk with <strong>Ambassador William J. Burns</strong>, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, about America’s changing role in the world and the purpose of American diplomacy. </p><p><br></p><p><strong>William J. Burns</strong> is president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the author of <a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/01/25/back-channel-memoir-of-american-diplomacy-and-case-for-its-renewal-pub-78072" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Back Channel: A Memoir of American Diplomacy and the Case for its Renewal</em></a> (Random House, 2019). He retired from the U.S. Foreign Service in 2014 after a thirty-three-year diplomatic career. He holds the highest rank in the Foreign Service, career ambassador, and is only the second serving career diplomat in history to become deputy secretary of state. Prior to his tenure as deputy secretary, Ambassador Burns served from 2008 to 2011 as undersecretary for political affairs. He was ambassador to Russia from 2005 to 2008, assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs from 2001 to 2005, and ambassador to Jordan from 1998 to 2001. Ambassador Burns earned a bachelor’s degree in history from La Salle University and master’s and doctoral degrees in international relations from Oxford University, where he studied as a Marshall Scholar. He and his wife, Lisa, have two daughters.</p>]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[The Institute for Human Sciences <iwm@iwm.at>]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:13:08 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Big Data and Spurious Correlations]]></title>
                <link>https://beyond-eve.com/en/events/big-data-and-spurious-correlations</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Big data analytics is a remarkable new field of investigation. However, the effectiveness of the new field seems to encourage an aggressive “philosophy” or “methodology” based on the dictum that “with enough data, the numbers speak for themselves”. We show, using Ramsey theory and algorithmic information theory, that this view is radically wrong. Specifically, we prove that, exactly because of their very large size, databases have to contain arbitrary correlations, most of them spurious. These correlations appear only on account of the size, not because of the nature of data. The scientific method can be enriched by computer mining over immense databases, but cannot be replaced by it.

Prof. Dr. Cristian S. Calude]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[Collegium Helveticum]]></author>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:03:49 +0100</pubDate>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
